been trying to structure my argument to discuss EU's role and nature in the international scene. yes this is one of my take home exams. i just dont know why i cant type and let my thoughts flow like the river. i believed i've read enough materials to be able to at least scribbles 1000 words. but im only up to 319 at the moment and im still at the first question.
haiya.. why does it have to be so hard? i am my biggest enemy. i admit im not the most dilligent person in the world, but im not that lazy either. im laid back as i like to put it. thus im trying to see of writing this post will give me the mood i need to continue typing my exam.
In discussing the role and nature of European Union in the international scene, it can be clearly acknowledge that EU is an eminent actor. Its take on the economy and trade negotiations has proven to be its strongest international action. Although many scholars have tried to fit EU into existing theory of international relations, still a formula to fully describe EU's very existence is lacking. Moreover, international relations theory that is commonly used to describes pattern of actor is in international relations could not satisfy this need. EU's hybrid polity and its uniqueness cant fit into any of the prevailing paradigm. However, Sjostedt suggested a system of implementation that pretty much act as a typology of framework to understand EU's identity as international actors through five sets of instruments.
oh no me sleepy.
No comments:
Post a Comment